Joined
·
60 Posts
I switch back and forth from the stock 30" tire and 32" skat trak's. Overall the skats are 70lbs lighter than stock and the car is exactly the same between the two sets of tires rpm and power wise.
Any changes in your clutching if so what are they? or all stock?I switch back and forth from the stock 30" tire and 32" skat trak's. Overall the skats are 70lbs lighter than stock and the car is exactly the same between the two sets of tires rpm and power wise.
I called DynoJet today inquiring about the spring rate and Helix cut. Never got an answer to either, just got. "Our kit is made for the XX, not meant to be sold individually or added to other clutch kits"DynoJet has a clutch kit now available too, no info on helix cut or spring weight but in the downloads is an installation manual for reference.
View attachment 251988
We run 43 gram weights out here at 11,000 ft. elevation with the 36-45 helix and the EPI 60-200 primary spring. We also use the 200-280 secondary spring. 32" tires. Stock machines. 9500 rpm's all day long. This setup runs fantastic at high elevation. Custom weights. We also run this setup at Moab, Utah, but with 46 gram weights. Engagement is at 2400 rpm's for Moab. We are testing different custom EBS helixes at Moab.Also curious. Can you post elevation, tire size, tune, and other weight in the vehicle for reference? I’m surprised you can go that heavy in weights and pull 9k or better. I have alba tune and 32s and at 6k ft need 48g or less to pull over 9k wot
I want to thank you for posting all of your results, it’s been really helpful for me. I am getting ready to try the Venom red/gold/black (810003) ......... 55-225 / 22 - 176. Was using that 35-195 spring prior and with the light tip weights that upper number was too much for it. This should give me even lower engagement too!I just wanted to post this since there was some talk about it a while back.
I have been waiting for the AC 0646-439 (50-250) spring for months. I forgot I ordered it, it's been so long. It finally showed up and it measures the same as the 0646-467 (35-195).
The 35-195 spring is still my favorite but for some reason it is double the price.
The 50-250 spring should be a good alternative if you can find it
That's a problem with production parts. Depending on how often they are checking the tooling, and with tolerances maybe plus or minus a couple ten thousanths you could really change a clutch. Some people have buttons that are sloppy and wear out quick. I have buttons that are too tight and never wear. Some snowmobile guys have said they have several of the same spring so they can find the one that works the best.I recently messed up my driven clutch - the retaining bolt came loose (Belleville washer no longer cupped) and the splines on the outer sheave were damaged. I know Arctic Cat changed the part number on the drive clutch when they started using a different spring, but the replacement driven clutch was exactly the same p/n as my original, so if the p/n rules are applied the same way, it is most likely identical. The original clutch kept the revs at around 8400 rpm at WOT. The new clutch lets the engine rev to 9100 rpm at WOT.
I haven't had a driven apart, so my lay-person's understanding of how the clutches combine to change ratio may not be 100% accurate. I'm wondering what would cause the difference. Is the new clutch just not fully broken in, so it does not spread as quickly/easily? I've put about 100 miles on it.
On a side note, I purchased a header (not yet installed) and ECM reflash (also not applied) from Alba during their Black Friday pricing. I had been thinking I might get away without needing the clutch kit since my shift rpm was low. I guess that is out the window now, although I suppose I could install the new outer sheave with the old driven and see if the revs drop back.
I also just got a new secondary and after reading this i am hoping it helps my rpm issue as wellI recently messed up my driven clutch - the retaining bolt came loose (Belleville washer no longer cupped) and the splines on the outer sheave were damaged. I know Arctic Cat changed the part number on the drive clutch when they started using a different spring, but the replacement driven clutch was exactly the same p/n as my original, so if the p/n rules are applied the same way, it is most likely identical. The original clutch kept the revs at around 8400 rpm at WOT. The new clutch lets the engine rev to 9100 rpm at WOT.
I haven't had a driven apart, so my lay-person's understanding of how the clutches combine to change ratio may not be 100% accurate. I'm wondering what would cause the difference. Is the new clutch just not fully broken in, so it does not spread as quickly/easily? I've put about 100 miles on it.
On a side note, I purchased a header (not yet installed) and ECM reflash (also not applied) from Alba during their Black Friday pricing. I had been thinking I might get away without needing the clutch kit since my shift rpm was low. I guess that is out the window now, although I suppose I could install the new outer sheave with the old driven and see if the revs drop back.
Nope. Do you really think the little dimples they put in the stock cover are making a difference? That shitty plastic fan is more than offsetting whatever gain they might have got. The stock cover weighs almost nothing and the tiny amount they took out of it is less than nothing compared to the mass of the whole assembly. The LaRue cover adds a noticeable amount of perfectly balanced mass to the outside and eliminates the plastic fan.Crawlr, do you have a plan for balancing the clutch with the Larue cover?
Speaking of buttons. The last time had my primary off, when I pressed the sheaves together, they would stay together. The spring should push them back apart right? It seems where my buttons slide up & down the "towers" is too tight. I'm thinking about hitting the "towers" with some very fine grit sand paper so the buttons can slide on them more easily & the sheaves can open/close freely as they should. Maybe this will take care of my jumpy/shuttering low rpm belt engagement?